Capability
Software can verify roughly half of WCAG. This is for the other half.
Whether the focus order makes sense, whether an error message actually helps, whether a video's captions are accurate: these need a person. Complaudax makes sure that person's work is recorded.
What the checklist covers
For each site, Complaudax keeps a checklist of the WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 success criteria that automated detection cannot settle: keyboard operability, focus order and visibility, meaningful sequence, error identification and suggestions, media alternatives, and the rest of the judgment calls. Each item explains what to check and what a pass looks like, in plain language.
Checked off, per site, with a record
Items are checked off per site as you review them, so a returning audit starts from what was already verified instead of from zero. The record matters as much as the review: when a conformance report is generated, it distinguishes what was verified by a person from what was verified by software, which is the honest way to present automated coverage.
Why this is part of the same tool
Splitting automated findings and manual review across two tools is how criteria fall through the gap. In Complaudax both live against the same site, feed the same issue history, and end up in the same document. If you are building a review habit, the WCAG 2.1 AA checklist guide pairs well with this feature.
Included on every plan
The manual checklist ships with the core workflow, from the free plan up. See pricing for what each plan adds around it, or start with the product overview.